The School-to-Prison Pipeline in Washington State

In July 2024, both of Washington State’s primary juvenile rehabilitation facilities — Green Hill School in Chehalis and Echo Glen Children’s Center in Snoqualmie — suspended intakes. Green Hill had reached 240 residents, 60% above its target capacity of 150. DCYF Secretary Ross Hunter said what anyone who works in youth justice already knew: “When too many young people are concentrated in small spaces it can escalate behaviors and limit the ability for therapeutic rehabilitation.”

A lawyer with the county Office of Public Defense put it more bluntly: “No rehabilitation is happening at Green Hill right now.”

The Disparities

Washington’s youth justice system mirrors the national pattern of racial disproportion:

• Black youth are 5 times as likely to be incarcerated as white youth
• Indigenous youth are more than 3 times as likely
• Latino youth are more than 2 times as likely
• White youth referred to juvenile court are more likely to receive diversion than youth of color

These ratios are not explained by differences in behavior. They are explained by differences in how behavior is interpreted, punished, and channeled by institutions.

The Pipeline Is Real — And Now Proven

For years, the “school-to-prison pipeline” was a metaphor. In 2024, it became a proven causal mechanism.

A landmark study published in the American Economic Journal: Economic Policy by Bacher-Hicks, Billings, and Deming found that students at schools with stricter discipline policies are 15-20% more likely to be arrested and incarcerated as adults. This was not correlation — it was causal evidence, established through rigorous methodology.

The pipeline operates through a well-documented sequence:

1. Suspension and expulsion — 786,600 K-12 students received in-school suspensions in the 2020-21 school year. 638,700 received out-of-school suspensions. 28,300 were expelled.
2. Racial disparity in discipline — Black students are 15% of K-12 enrollment but over 30% of suspensions, expulsions, and school arrests. Black girls received almost half of all suspensions and expulsions. Black preschool boys — 9% of enrollment — received 23% of out-of-school suspensions.
3. Criminalization — Schools with School Resource Officers saw a 21% increase in exclusionary discipline.
4. Incarceration — The 2024 AEJ study closed the loop: school discipline doesn’t just correlate with adult incarceration. It causes it.

A 2024 study in the Journal of Adolescence documented how this pipeline transmits intergenerationally — mass incarceration reproduces itself across generations through the school system.

What Incarceration Does to Children

The research on juvenile incarceration outcomes is devastating:

• 60-70% of detained adolescents meet criteria for at least one mental health disorder, compared to 20% in the general population
• Mental health symptoms worsen during detainment
• Up to 80% of incarcerated youth are rearrested within 3 years of release
• Incarceration as a juvenile increases the probability of adult recidivism by 22-26%
• In a survey of 100 completed suicides in juvenile detention, 50% occurred while juveniles were confined to their rooms
• The prefrontal cortex — responsible for impulse control and social intelligence — does not fully mature until ages 20-30. Solitary confinement can cause irreparable damage to this still-developing system.

A comprehensive 2024 systematic review of 18 studies concluded: “Juvenile incarceration and subsequent interactions that occur within correctional settings create a cascading effect that shapes long-term trajectories often marked by diminished opportunities for positive development and an increase in adverse outcomes.”

What Actually Works

The Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative (JDAI), spanning 300+ jurisdictions in 40 states:

• Reduced daily detention populations by 43%
• Cut admissions by 90,000 per year
• Reported a 40% drop in juvenile offenses
• Recidivism improved from 73.3% (2008 cohort) to 49.8% (2019 cohort)

Functional Family Therapy (FFT): Reduces felony recidivism by 35% at ~$3,600 per youth, with a net benefit of $6,900 per participant from averted juvenile crime.

Deep-End Reform pilot sites confined at least 50% fewer young people without compromising public safety.

The Cost Comparison

The economics alone should be enough:

• Youth incarceration in WA costs an estimated $200,000-$300,000 per youth per year
• Functional Family Therapy costs $3,600 per youth and returns $6,900 in averted crime costs
• Community-based alternatives operate at a fraction of incarceration costs while producing better outcomes on every metric

For every dollar spent incarcerating a young person, roughly $50-80 could have been spent on therapeutic alternatives that actually reduce reoffending.

A Different Path

The TEK8 Crystal Cycle is designed around the opposite of the school-to-prison pipeline. Instead of exclusionary discipline, there is restorative play. Instead of hierarchical sorting, there is the attainment system — where a 3 on a D4 (75%) matters as much as a 15 on a D20 (75%). Instead of removing children from community, the cycle builds community in every session.

When Chandler and Lalonde found that communities with all six cultural continuity factors had zero youth suicides, they were documenting the same principle: self-determination is the intervention. Give young people agency over their own growth, and the behaviors that lead to incarceration lose their purpose.

---

Green Hill is over capacity. The pipeline is proven. The alternatives are cheaper and they work. The only question is whether we will choose them.

---

Sources: DCYF (2024), PCJJ Biennial Report (2024), Bacher-Hicks et al. (2024) AEJ: Economic Policy, Prison Policy Initiative (2025), Annie E. Casey Foundation, OJJDP CJRP 2023, CDC YRBS 2023.